Are We Clear? Crystal.
My first patient had me thinking of a number of things at once. The first thought was of one of my first clinical instructors, who described his process of differential diagnosis: "I ask questions, and I keep asking questions until I have a crystal clear image in my mind of what might be wrong with this patient." I also thought of the "clinical tales" of Dr. Irvin Yalom, where he initiates the assessment with the simple words, "What ails?" Questioning. "What brings you here today?" "How can I help you?" And, of course, the ever-poular, "So, what's up?" Now, be sure to read Dinah's interesting take on what people talk about in therapy (before she thinks I have again stolen from her): "I've taken to giving patients fairly specific instructions about what I want to hear, what I think will be helpful to them." This, I believe (and feel free to correct my presumption, ShrinkRap), presumes you have already determined what is wrong; what needs to be "helped."This patient presents with the textbook affect of major depression: sad face, slow shuffling walk, eyes averted, shoulders hunched. He has a fundamental lack of animation, absent range of emotion, soft and pressured speech. Yet, when he speaks, his vocabulary, thought process, and general "fund of information" suggests that he is quite intelligent. But like a prepared witness, he offers no more than what I specifically ask. Sleep & appetite disturbance, lack of motivation, doesn't seem to enjoy much of anything; about two years ago, when he was especially depressed, he admits to hearing voices. The voices have continued, and now he "sees shadows or ghosts" in his peripheral vision; "When I turn to look, they're gone." "Why are you here to see me?" "I need to re-apply for Social Security Disability." Disability? This is an anomoly among these patients, generally, because to qualify, you must have an actual history of work, "on the books," and have actually paid taxes & FICA. This is only the second request in as many years.
It turns out he has an AA degree, was going to night school to get his BA, and had a "niche" job in a major technology company because he had training in an unique specialization. Until the "accident." "How did you get on disability?" "I got in an accident at work and was injured." "What happened?" Nothing. Silence. He is looking at the floor and remains unresponsive. I wait a reasonable moment and gently say, "Can you tell me about the accident?" Tears begin rolling down his face, but he makes no eye-contact, nor provides a response. He has now dropped his head in his arms onto the table. Again, I wait a reasonable moment and gently say, "In order for me to help you, you have to help me understand." Another silence, and finally, "I'm sorry. I just can't talk about it." Wow. OK.
As I consider the next course of action, I offer him some water, and finally ask if he believes he can continue. Factually, if he is filing for SSDI for a physical disability, I really don't need a psych work-up, and I also realize that under these circumstances, I shouldn't be seeing him in the first place. This fact is made more prominent when he tells me that he has a $50,000 brokerage account and a trust for his children. But equally factual is that applying for disability doesn't take a lot of time or effort, and there is no harm in helping him. He signs the forms, I ask the minimal questions, and we're done.
Lastly, I ask, "What is your controlling case?" (i.e. the crime that brought you to prison). Without a hesitation and with direct eye-contact he casually says, "Forced oral copulation of a minor with violence, and possession of a controlled substance." WTF! I am shocked at the bluntness of his statement; like he had just told me the Padre's score. After he leaves I get his chart: First-time offender. Depression NOS, Mirtazapine 45 mg. q hs. Axis III, "lower back pain." Report of radiology consult of the lower back: no evidence of trauma or derangement, inconclusive. Absolutely no reference, not one, to any accident.
"You can't handle the truth!"

8 Comments:
Foo (do you prefer Foo, or Foofoo or FooFoo?),
I am so pleased to be linked and credited.
Your story (and have I told you how much I enjoy your stories?) is about a psychiatric evaluation. My post was about what patients talk about in ongoing psychotherapy.
I did, however, once write a post discussing initial evaluations (I allow 90-120 minutes for the first visit: do you do that in jail?)
try: http://psychiatrist-blog.blogspot.com/2006/05/perception-vs-reality.html
Lots of Q&A, gives me a chance to formulate a diagnosis, and also to think about what aspects of life might be problematic for a patient. The evaluation--figuring out why they're there and what the controlling crime (I like that) was, is a whole different deal than therapy.
But really, since what I want them to talk about is what meaningful things have happened since the last session, I don't really need to walk in the door knowing where we're going. I'm easy: I'd rather not hear about grocery lists and the comparative price of beef, but hey, if it makes you feel better......
I shouldn't give you a hard time. Thank you for linking to me.
Whoa and I thought I was nutz.
Wow, Foo. I was riveted throughout this entry. I just returned to work after a 2 week short term disability I took due to poor performance at work because of my depression and anxiety and (alleged) Borderline Personality Disorder (I still feel deep down that I am just lazy, worthless and unmotivated).
I have looked into SSDI just in case but it looks like a long and disappointing road.
I am excited that I have almost made it through a full week of work, and think it is important to hang on as long as I can.
However, I have been working since I was 15 (am now 37) and if I really need to, I will file.
It will be a decision that will be tough and a last resort and that will be between me and the new doc.
I can't help but fear getting fired. It would be better for me to go on long term disability at work because I would have some income and benefits. I'm really scared.
ouch...
This was a really good post. You write very well, foo - I'm gonna link you up.
later!
Jack says it all, doesn't he. But what your patient fails to understand, is that people that work with prisoners on a daily basis use univeral precautions (Assume they're all liars).
Very riveting read, Foo. I can identify with your inmate interactions.
I had all sorts of pressing comments to post on your new blog. I tried twice, it wouldn't let me post.
You'll never know what you're missing.
I tried once again. The new Blog blocks me, I'm taking this personally.
Hi Dr. Foo,
I read your latest "how to comment" instructions. I tried to sign in. I'm not so sure of my google account info (Roy set it up for all of us) and that didn't work. There was no "other" option, and your blog specifically doesn't allow anonymous comments.
After you're Eating Raoul post, I just wanted to say--and I would only need to say this to a forensic psychiatrist, ever-- I don't eat my friends.
I do like the new look. Is that your pic by the bars?
And while your first link to the med student works, the second one doesn't.
Basically, I surrender. Throw me in the hole.
Post a Comment
<< Home